An alternative title for this post could be, the internet rediscovers momentum and hates it, episode 5,000….

Meb Faber posted the other day on a strategy that buys stocks only at their all-time highs and otherwise holds bonds the rest of the time. The strategy has great risk-adjusted returns. It’s a great post, check it out. Also, AllocateSmartly put it through their backtest methodology in a post yesterday. Jake at Econompicdata wrote about it a few years back and I did as well about two years ago.

Meb takes a bit further and uses a bunch of other assets besides stocks to make the point even stronger. There was a lot of skepticism on what basically amounts to a momentum strategy. Or you can call it a trend following strategy. It’s just a different way of measuring asset price strength. Every time this comes up there is tons of disbelief. Yet, on the other hand, if you post the results of some value based strategy and its outperformance, most people are in agreement. Yeah, of course value outperforms. Maybe this is why momentum remains the premium factor by far as I showed in my post. Anway, I wanted to post on a slightly different version of the buy at the highs strategy that eliminates a few of its big drawbacks.

Probably the biggest drawback of the buy at the highs strategy is that it is holding bonds most of the time, about 70% of the time. So, you’re only invested in the highest returning asset class over the long term a third of the time. Like AllocateSmartly put it, “The strategy holds stocks less than 30% of the time, so this is really a bond strategy that selectively holds stocks when they’re showing extreme strength.” Going forward this is going to matter a lot more as bonds today are priced for way lower returns than in the past. As you’ll see in a minute the returns to the buy at the highs strategy have decreased over time (see table below), at least since the early 1970s, as bond yields have decreased. No surprise there. Now, let’s take the spirit of the buy at the highs strategy and apply the concept a bit differently.

In this modified approach, what I call the ‘Less than 10% DD’ (drawdown) strategy, we’re going to buy and hold US stocks (SPY), when the drawdown of the index (SPY) is less than 10% measured on a monthly basis. When the index is in a drawdown of greater than 10%, then the strategy switches to a trend following model using the 6 mo SMA. The trend following side of the strategy is in SPY when the index is above its 6 mo SMA, and in bonds (IEF), when it is below it’s 6 mo SMA. Basically, we switch from a buy and hold approach to a trend following approach based on the state of drawdown of the index. That’s it. This strategy ends up holding stocks about 70% of the time and bonds about 30% of the time. Returns and drawdowns are posted below and I compare them to my calculations for the buy at the highs strategy.

By being exposed to stocks the majority of the time, instead of bonds, the Less than 10% DD strategy has higher drawdowns, but much higher returns. By measuring momentum a bit differently but still with the goal of protecting the downside, this approach is just another way of buy and holding strength.

That’s about it. As Meb, Jake, and AllocateSmartly, mentioned in their posts this is not an endorsement of this approach over others – there are way better ways to implement TAA strategies as we all show, but that stock price strength in general, the majority of the time, begets more strength. Or in other words, momentum works and there are lots of ways to go implementing it!


6 Comments

Mark Helm · November 7, 2019 at 6:52 am

Paul,

Great article. This version of Buy at the Top reminds me of a huge (and utterly unappreciated) advantage of your TAA COMP systems: You’re in the stock or real estate markets the vast majority of time. So many TAA strategies – including Faber’s Buy the Top experiment – have you in bonds the majority of the time. This creates two big disadvantages.

First, expected returns on bonds going forward is pitiful, likely in the ballpark of inflation, maybe less. This will be a major drag on performance.

Second (and related), because you are spending so much time in bonds, you are placing a serious bet on your TAA strategy working. If it doesn’t, you will earn almost nothing. If, however, you use a TAA strategy that is invested in risk assets such as stocks or bonds the vast majority of time, you should earn what they earn even if your TAA strategy doesn’t work, assuming random returns.

If momentum/trend turn out to be just wishful thinking, a typical TAA strategy that’s over the long run 30% stock/70% bonds will earn what a 30/70 buy-and-hold mix would return. Your Buy at the Top version, similar to your TAA COMP strategies, have you in stocks 70% to 85% of the time, so let’s just say 75% stock/25% bond. Again, even if those strategies turn out to be wrong, you should still earn what a 75% stock/25% bond portfolio would return, which is far less dangerous to your ability to reach your goals.

Best,
Mark

    paul.novell@gmail.com · November 8, 2019 at 2:31 am

    Hey Mark,

    Great point.

    Paul

john · November 17, 2019 at 10:13 am

Hi Paul:

Thanks for your excellent post! When you say 10% drawdown, I am assuming you are describing the maximum drawdown. If so, what is your time period of calculating the drawdown – 6 mths, 12 mths, forever? I hope you are well.

    paul.novell@gmail.com · November 22, 2019 at 4:47 am

    Thanks John. In this case max drawdown is forever and calculated on a monthly basis.

    Paul

      Ben · November 30, 2019 at 8:11 am

      Following up on john’s question, how are the results from this approach different vs a 6 month SMA?

      It feels to me (but I may be completely wrong) that when the model is « on » the majority of the time we would be in a state where the SPY is above its moving average. Are there many periods where the SPY drawdown is less than 10% and the SPY is below its moving average?

      Thank you
      Ben

        paul.novell@gmail.com · December 2, 2019 at 12:45 am

        Performance is similar to a trend following approach using the 6 mo SMA but turnover is about half. Yes, there are quite a few times where monthly drawdown is less than 10% and the SPY is below its moving average.

        Paul

Comments are closed.