Note: thanks to those who signed up to Allocate Smartly through my link. It’s provided a nice extra revenue stream that is much appreciated.

One of the TAA strategies that I have often been asked about is Antonacci’s Composite Dual Momentum (ACDM from now on). I never got around to tracking or writing about it but now the the folks at Allocate Smartly have it covered. In this post I’ll highlight the key details of the strategy and it’s results using the recent blog post from Allocate Smartly.

The ACDM strategy basically applies the dual momentum concept from Antonacci’s GEM strategy to a broader array of asset classes. I also covered GEM on my portfolios page. The strategy uses four areas of the market with a 25% allocation to each re-balanced monthly; equites (US or International stocks), credit risk (corporate or high yield bonds), real estate (equity REITs or mortgage REITs), and economic stress (gold or long US treasuries). It then applies to dual momentum concept to each. Does this remind you of any other TAA strategy already? I’ll come back to that but first let’s look at the results going back to 1985.

screen-shot-2016-11-08-at-6-44-16-am

Pretty impressive. Strong results in absolute terms and especially in risk adjusted returns. These kinds of risk adjusted returns are great for enhancing safe withdrawal rates from retirement portfolios. Here is the drawdown curve for ACDM.

screen-shot-2016-11-08-at-6-48-04-am

Drawdowns are also quite impressive with a max monthly drawdown of less than 10%. The 4 market regimes remind me of the the Permanent Portfolio. The market regimes are meant to be less correlated which leads to better overall risk adjusted portfolio results.  The ACDM seems to accomplish this, just like the Permanent Portfolio, but with better returns and lower drawdowns. There is not enough historical return data to calculate a comparable SWR but it would arguably be better than the Permanent Portfolio’s 1966 SWR of 5.6% which is already better than the traditional 60/40 portfolio’s SWR of 4.3%

Overall, ACDM looks like quite a powerful and well diversified strategy. In particular with it’s strong risk adjusted performance it could be a good fit for those investors in the retirement phase of their investing who are withdrawing from their portfolios and seeking to maximize SWRs (safe withdrawal rates) with TAA portfolios.


3 Comments

Mark · November 10, 2016 at 6:20 pm

You are welcome Paul! Least we could do for all the great advice and content you have given us who follow your blog. I have been impressed with Allocate Smartly and have provided some suggestions to make the sight even better. They seem very committed to keep improving the site and continuing to add value for their subscribers.

Hoping you keep doing what you do here!

Thanks
Mark

JW · November 12, 2016 at 6:38 am

Reviewing ACDM for 1971-2016 with added crisis alpha (SHY or IEF alternating instead of cash) results in the following allocation diagram:
http://www.screencast.com/t/MxWWxxBiG

Annual P/L diagram: http://www.screencast.com/t/uxQ5CAGEty

@Paul: return data available for SWR calculation

    paul.novell@gmail.com · November 12, 2016 at 6:54 am

    Thanks JW. Looks like a good modification to the strategy. Return data back to 1971 would make the SWR calculation realistic. I usually require back to 1973 at least. Could you point me to where I can download the annual return data? email me if you like.

    Paul

Comments are closed.